Jump to content

Talk:Narendra Modi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNarendra Modi has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
March 15, 2017Good article nomineeListed
July 8, 2017Good article reassessmentKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 17, 2020, and September 17, 2022.
Current status: Good article

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 January 2025

[edit]

This article is not neutrally written and in the initial paragraphs, only the negatives of Shri Modi have been written. Some thats that haven't even been proved are mentined such as "failure of balakote". I request any 30/500 editor to edit this and make it a neutral essay as it is wrong for our international image of India. 122.161.243.22 (talk) 12:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are requesting to remove the detailing and references about the "failure" of the Balatok air strike conducted by India. As it is not factually correct. Zebahumac (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What isn't factually correct, though? This article appears to align with 2019 Balakot airstrike. Black Kite (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How do wiki say it's a failure? It's a failure because pakistan say so? I don't see any conclusive evidence the citation provide. That all based on skepticism. 2409:40C2:3E:906F:B1:5FF:FEE1:1225 (talk) 15:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
they say so based on editorial lines, personal judgements, and preconceived agendas as I guess as I could not find any factual evidence in the citations. 103.29.116.82 (talk) 08:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Typo - economy section

[edit]

There is a typo in the Prime minister - economic section:

"During the first eight years of Modi's premiership, India's GDP grew at an average rate of 5.5% per cent compared tho the rate of 7.03 per cent under the previous government."

Should be "to" instead of "tho" Petrosm7 (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Capitals00 (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
under previous govt. avg gdp growth was 6.81 and we cant blame modi for 2020 gdp downfall as it was a worldwide economy crash due to covid Sarvagyalal (talk) 05:42, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balakot Airstrike 2019 / Democratic backsliding

[edit]

India has given proofs( Source ThePrint) about Balakot airstrike. Please dont use biased websites like Washington post, Al Jazeera, New york Times , who always write against India. that airstrike was a success as we cant trust pakistan who have blalantly lied in the past. Sarvagyalal (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No proof of democratic backsliding , only biased anti India , western websites like BBC, New York Times, Washington Post, claim about democratic backsliding. There are fair elections in India, people have freedom to speech ( unlike in emergency 1975). Sarvagyalal (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Both of these sections are cited to reliable sources (and the sources are not all Western writers either). If you have proof that such sources are biased against India, the place to raise this is WP:RS/N. Also, the existence of elections - even if fair - is not the definition of democracy. Black Kite (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 March 2025

[edit]

In 2020 delhi roits muslim were not killed by hindu mob . instead most of protester were funded And roit were planned by unknown bodies to destablize india . Please remove word democratic backslide. As india if not best ,then it is definitely one of the best performing democracy in world 27.58.23.56 (talk) 03:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rainsage (talk) 04:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New title of GCSK must be added to his name

[edit]

New title of GCSK must be added to his name 102.119.24.75 (talk) 16:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you need to be more specific (what, for example, is GCSK?). Please also note that titles are not generally added to names so you will need to make a specific case for adding this one. RegentsPark (comment) 17:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]