Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

10 March 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 09	March 11 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Khokhar Dynasty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of the salted Khokhar Confederacy with fake sourcing ("Management of Liver Abscess"???) or sources that don't even mention Khokhar (e.g. this one. I could find no book sources for Khokhar + 1206 or Khokhar + 1516, the supposed start and end dates of this dynasty. I can find no other sources using the flag either. Fram (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India. Fram (talk) 13:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Per WP:G4. – Garuda ^Talk! 13:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zameer Sattaur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a few passing mentions in reputable sources, e.g. [1], [2], and [3] which confirm the subject's position at Masjid Al-Abdin, and [4] which notes his position as the owner of a Hajj travel company, but nothing with significant coverage apart from [5] which is not a reliable source. There are also a number of press releases from the subject's travel company, e.g. [6], and [7] is, I think, the subject's personal site, but none of that helps with notability. All-in-all, I submit that the subject does not meet WP:BIO, and notability is not established. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and New York. SunloungerFrog (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addanki Dayakar

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously soft-deleted at AFD. Ran unsuccessfully in the 2018 election and is now a candidate for the 2025 election. The article should only be recreated if the subject wins or receives sustained, significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. At this point, fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, and WP:NPOL, with no in-depth coverage beyond routine election announcements. Junbeesh (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, India, and Telangana. Junbeesh (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The infobox says he’s a member of the parliament since March. I can’t find a source to verify this (I’m lazy to do a search); can someone verify this? If yes, then it’s a clear pass of NPOL#1. If it fails, I guess it should be removed from the infobox. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 10:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Still non-notable. I can't find anything about the actor, the political career is limited to articles saying the person is a candidate, then some coverage for having said things [8] that people didn't like. I don't see enough coverage to build an article with. Oaktree b (talk) 13:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defense

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a lengthy plot summary and a neatly organized list of appearances in media. No reception/analysis. Publication history could be merged to List of Hellboy comics, since it is arguably better formatted. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hellboy Universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a weird fork of List of Hellboy comics. It purports to be about a fictional entity ("The Hellboy Universe is the fictional universe of the Hellboy comic"), and is categorized within Category:Fictional universes, but it contains neither the expect plot summary or the hoped for analysis or reception; instead it's just a long list of publications. It's unclear why the broad concept of Hellboy's franchise does not encompass comics; per WP:ATD I think this could be merged to the aforementioned list of comics - or Hellboy (franchise) (which for some reason seems to be only about films and such, and not about the printed media - even through obviously they all are part of the franchise...). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and Lists. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Left Behind characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone suggested at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_6#Lukas_Miklos that this page should be AFD'd for being a poorly-sourced fancruft page, and as such I decided to step up to the job :P User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Al-Usaimi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. This source was added which may or may not be him but in any case is primary. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Saudi Arabia. LibStar (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eliana González

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not have significant news coverage and fails WP:TENNIS. RolandSimon (talk) 04:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. RolandSimon (talk) 04:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She was getting news coverage literally just last year for going on her third Olympic run (which isn't currently mentioned in the article, by the way). What news search did you make if this first page of Google results didn't show up for you? Silverseren^C 06:33, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably the same as mine. Using the above "find sources" without using any tricks that I have up my sleeve and usually employ, I get an actor, someone in Colombia, someone from Argentina, and accounts with this name on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and SoundCloud. Welcome to Google Web search! ☺ Google News has several people with the wrong name, someone who stabbed someone, and the actor again. Bing News has a volleyball player. Google Books has a member of FARC and someone who thought that this was a good pseudonym choice for an account of a torture victim. Search results are not identical for different people. The full name certainly helps, but the article creator didn't put it in the article. Uncle G (talk) 18:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - I mean, it's a common name, sure. That's why a search shouldn't be done with just someone's name, but also the subject they're relevant to. In this case, table tennis. And since this is a Peruvian player, one should be using Spanish, hence "tenis de mesa". Use that with just her regular name above, not even needing the full name, and you'll get plenty of news hits. Now, as for whether there's also coverage from her events back in the 90's, that's going to require a deeper dive into Spanish language sources. Silver seren^C 21:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Olympics, Tennis, and Peru. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 07:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qezeljeh, Ahar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability whatsoever. This article basically just says "this exists" without further clarification. Sources just state the administrative division of the place and the location, not much more JekyllTheFabulous (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG. I'm unable to find any credible source. Ʀasteem Talk 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking up the Anglicizations was a nightmare, produced at least one Anglicization that we did not have which in turn had a lot of false positives, and only yielded prose-free gazetteers with map coördinates, several different ones. Looking up the Persian name showed promise at one point, until it turned out to be a place in Iraq. This is a permanent substub, sourced to a dead spreadsheet, about which we can barely write verifiable prose at all. Uncle G (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Openstreetmap takes you directly to a small town at the end of a road which shares a Persian name with the Persian link for Qezeljeh. If we can locate that census, this would pass WP:NGEO. SportingFlyer T·C 03:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I can only verify this to Google Maps and Openstreetmap, but there is clearly a populated place at the point on the map using satellite photos. Google seems to think it's Anglicanized to Qezelje when you click on the addresses of one of the gardens in the photo. Still needs more work, though. SportingFlyer T·C 06:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 07:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Buffon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, obviously. No achievements and only one match at senior level. The sources only mention that he has famous parents and that he will not represent Italy in the youth categories, which does not make him notable for an encyclopedic article. FromCzech (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Czech Republic, and Italy. FromCzech (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article on Louis Buffon should definitely stay active. According to Wikipedia’s guidelines for footballers, anyone who has played even a single professional match qualifies as notable. His relationship as Gianluigi Buffon’s son doesn’t change that. In my view, the article deserves to remain. Slancio2 (talk) 08:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WP:NFOOTY is no longer used to assess notability outright, he needs to pass WP:GNG now. Canary757 (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So my question is this: why is this criterion still active if, in reality, it is no longer usable? Slancio2 (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For historical reference. I'm not sure it is still active. Canary757 (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you also to see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability. Slancio2 (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to point out that even though he is currently on the Czech Republic U18 team, he still has the option to switch to the Italian national team later on. FIFA regulations state that you cannot change your sporting nationality if you have played at least one match with the senior national team. As for media attention, he is already gaining some recognition. I believe, @FromCzech, you might be mistaken. Regardless, have a great day and take care. Slancio2 (talk) 08:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, the media addresses his parents and nationality, but does not document his notability. At 17, his career had barely begun. Since the WP:NSPORTS2022 global RfC, a professional match does not qualify a player notable. FromCzech (talk) 08:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there are many pages that, even with few matches, are still active. However, following the real criteria that still exist (I'm not referring to the discussion you just mentioned), it perfectly meets the minimum level of notability. I only ask that if a negative conclusion is reached, the page should not be deleted but moved to Draft or a sandbox. Slancio2 (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Unlike other cases of children of players who do not have notoriety in their own right, this one is already part of a national under-18 team, and there is clear repercussion for having chosen the mother's nation, instead Italy. There is WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV: Gazzetta dello Sport [9], [10], [11], Corriere della Serra [12], [13], [14], la Reppublica [15], il Messaggero [16], BBC [17], CNN Brazil [18], Prague Morning [19]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svartner (talk • contribs) 09:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - For the things that I said before. Slancio2 (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - SIGCOV has been demonstrated by Svartner. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 10:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Oderin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nobleman with a biography that hundreds of Czech medieval lower nobles had. The sources used are only Trivial mentions. FromCzech (talk) 07:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nomination is the same and my arguments are similar to those found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petr Píšek. To sum up, this was a politically important individual during a politically important time, as stated by the sources. The subject ruled from a notable castle. He was an early patron of what is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site. His portrayal in recent media is not irrelevant. This is a 600 year old figure, and there are undoubtedly undigitized sources or those I missed in my initial search. Mbdfar (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to repeat myself, but WP:SIGCOV is missing, so I don't even need to write any more reasons. He is from a councilor family, not a noble family. "Politically important" is not in the cited sources. He did not rule from a notable castle, but he just owned rural fort in Ratboř, as [3] says. Among the donors of the Church of St. Barbara were many town's burghers, as the source says, so this does not make him notable either. FromCzech (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petr Píšek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nobleman with a biography that hundreds of Czech medieval lower nobles had. The sources used are only trivial mentions. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I wrote this article as I believe the subject is a politically notable figure from an important family. The subject held royal appointments and was the ruler of several notable castles/villages. The sources I've found are brief, yes, but are clear that this subject was notable during a politically and militarily unstable time in the Kingdom of Bohemia. The subject is 600 years old, and I presume there are many sources that are not digitized or I have missed on my search. I also do not want to discount the modern depiction of the subject (even a characterization) in the recent video game referenced in the article. While not proof of notability on its own, I do believe it supports the above assertions. Mbdfar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the content of the article, he was the equivalent of a local politician, and ruled only the villages of Perštejnec, Vysoká and co-ruled Suchdol. His family was only a wealthy bourgeois family, not a noble family. There is no article for him or his family on cswiki, which would be very unlikely if him or his family was important like you say. You need WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate his notability. With all due respect, it seems that the main motivation for the creation of the page is the appearance of the character in the video game based on him, not the merits of the real character. FromCzech (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He ruled "only" three towns/castles. Respectfully, the cswiki has 7% of the articles that the enwiki does and is not a qualifier of subject notability. I learned about this historical figure through his portrayal in recent media, correct. My motivation for creating this page was improving Wikipedia's coverage of notable subjects found in this time and place. Mbdfar (talk) 11:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should not have written that last sentence. Cswiki is of course not qualifier of subject notability, I wrote this just for comparison. The existence of SIGCOV is decisive. FromCzech (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, to share a comment by Bigvadrouille549, where a source was provided "from the historian Emmnuel Leminger on the Italian Court. You can see that Peter of Pisek was mintmaster between 1391-99 [20]". The referenced text seems to be on page 169.

Another trivial mention in the list of burghers who held this clerk position. FromCzech (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tunde Olaoye

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only significant coverage I'm able to find are interviews. His work does not appear to pass WP:DIRECTOR Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 07:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nigeria. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 07:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't understand the nomination, onestamente. A director of two notable films with correct sourcing meets WP:NDIRECTOR. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets Wp:DIRECTOR with one notable film directed and another co-directed. -Mushy Yank. 09:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets the criteria for filmmakers. But to lead you more directly to what you have not seen: WP:FILMMAKER 4(c) "The person's work (or works) has ... won significant critical attention". WP:GNG: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The many published reviews constitute both "significant critical attention" and "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". They are indeed about the subject in the sense that they are entirely about the subject's work, the thing ~~she~~ he is notable for, just as we would expect significant coverage of an athlete to be about their athletic accomplishments or significant coverage of a musician to be about their musical performances. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He, not she. -Mushy Yank. 11:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me. I’ve been meaning to replace this lens. Haha. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The person exists, but there is no SIGCOV about them. These are the best I could find. [21] and [22], which aren't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aditi Technologies

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources are partnership and acquisition and run-of-the-mill business news. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 06:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 06:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Karnataka and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable company with churnalism and PR for references. Niafied (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Daśapura

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources that establish the "Kingdom of Daśapura" as a distinct historical entity. While Daśapura (modern Mandsaur) is historically significant, there is no scholarly consensus supporting the existence of an independent polity by this name. The topic appears to be WP:SYNTH, based on scattered references, rather than a well-defined subject in academic literature and the content seems to be a WP:POVFORK of the existing article on the Second Aulikara dynasty & Aulikaras, with overlapping material added without prior discussion or WP:CONSENSUS. NXcrypto Message 06:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, India, Jharkhand, and Madhya Pradesh. NXcrypto Message 06:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete I looked it up. Only result was Wikiwand's article for it. I mean, it could've been a tribe or another type of monarchy... A editor from mars (talk) 06:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nomination AlvaKedak (talk) 07:45, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bozz Zenith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:MUSICBIO KH-1 (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:48, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I looked at his YouTube channel, online, socials, and google. Nothing seemed to be notable enough for WP:MUSICBIO, only mention was a song of his charting on instagram, but I couldn't find that info anywhere else. Article also has some promotional language in it. Cheers. ✏️ C809 ⌨️ (let's chat) 06:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above. A editor from mars (talk) 06:45, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: ADMASQ. This could fall in place for A7 as I can’t find anything credible about this individual. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per above. Svartner (talk) 09:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, the article is now sourced to Apple music, so that's no help. This [23], hardly SIGCOV and still not enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hasya Movies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:NOTEBOMB'ed article with none of the sources passing the WP:SIRS check. Sources are related to their respective films and provide no coverage about the production house. There is not a single source in the article with significant coverage of the subject rather, they are all passing mentions in routine film announcements. Fails WP:NCORP Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Business, Companies, India, and Telangana. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The references are mainly mentions or more in-depth about the founder. Others are movie releases which routine announcements. As this is a company it must pass WP:NCORP and does not have the required sourcing per WP:ORGCRIT to do so. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Drozdowska

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO/GNG by the looks of it. KH-1 (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Science, Poland, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hossein Tohi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NMUSIC. KH-1 (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Iran, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Larsen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NBIO - sourced to PR/puff pieces. KH-1 (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Arab Emirates. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't even find that many primary sources, let alone secondary. I did a google on both him and the company, nothing from a secondary source. Article also sounds very promotional, especially the "Personal Life" Cheers. ✏️ C809 ⌨️ (let's chat) 06:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Forest Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of independent notability are provided in the article or readily found ElKevbo (talk) 03:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ElKevbo (talk) 03:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Science, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

La Paz F.C. (Colombia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does it really meet the criteria for notability? It's an amateur football club and there are no recent news about it. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Colombia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to FARC sounds best given the 1E coverage in RSes. Allan Nonymous (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – There is no point in keeping an article from an amateur club just because of its connection to a drug trafficking group. Svartner (talk) 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak? keep This does have a lot of coverage in a variety of sources over a long period of time and likely passes WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 05:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Femtanyl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I enjoy femtanyl's music, but this article does not cite sources demonstrating that the general notability guideline is met - it only has unreliable user-generated sources. HotNewHipHop and Pitchfork have covered the artist, but HNHH does not provide significant coverage of the artist's career/artistry as a whole, and the only source that perhaps contributes to notability to a slight extent is the Pitchfork review. Other than these two articles, a Google News search turns up passing mentions or affiliated tour listings; nothing else of value has been found in other searches. There's already a draft, so the article is not draftifiable. ObserveOwl (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Canada. ObserveOwl (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I tried a .ca website/news search, nothing turns up, a few concert listings. Not quite enough even with the two reviews mentioned above. Lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't know there was a draft already, sorry! Gaming gamer 9001 (talk) 13:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VkTrace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating at AfD after this article was deproded. Fails WP:NSOFT; only coverage beyond a trivial mention is this piece and even that isn't SIGCOV. Not worth mentioning in LunarG or Vulkan (API). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suleiman Yunusovich Kuchukov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article. Subject has no credible claim of notability. Low rank, lowly decorations, undistinguished service in World War I and the Russian Civil War. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Russia. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, completely non-notable soldier. Mztourist (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mztourist - he's completely correct, NN soldier. Might I suggest however the text is kept accessible in some way for merging the regimental and school cadet corps data to other articles on the Imperial Russian Army that could be expanded with it? Buckshot06 (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is no objection, I would like to merge some of the school and regimental information into Turkestan Military District. Regards to all, Buckshot06 (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  No objection but it doesn't seem to be referenced. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you check the ru it's gwar.mil.ru. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Folk High School in Gothenburg

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Finnish Folk High School in Gothenburg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable high school. No sources cited, and the only sources I could find were WP:PRIMARY. No WP:RS or WP:NOTE Mangoflies (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Sweden. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pan-Iranian colors

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is based on personal imagination and appears to be original research. The concept of "Pan-Iranian colors" does not exist, and no academic sources support this idea. The sources cited in the article discuss only the modern and historical flags of the country of Iran, which have no connection to other groups considered Iranian due to their language. Sikorki (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Sikorki (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uladyslau Ryzy-Ryski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability for this bishop of what appears to be a breakaway of a breakaway church of an Eastern Orthodox autocephalous church. I'm not seeing a WP:GNG pass; Melton and Walker have only trivial mentions of Ryzy-Ryski. Lewis has a few paragraphs but we need multiple instances of independent WP:SIGCOV. A search brings up only more trivial mentions, non-independent sources and unreliable/primary sources like Ancestry. I'm not sure where the reliable source for Ryzy-Ryski's birth date is (it's not cited in the article); the only source I found online for it is a mimeographed WP:SPS independent Catholic newsletter. And while I'm generally sympathetic to keeping articles on WP:BISHOPS, that essay applies to bishops of major denominations, and it's always debatable whether small splinter groups from those major traditions qualify in the absence of enough GNG-qualifying coverage. (Happy to withdraw this if more SIGCOV is found.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, Belarus, and New Hampshire. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ashmina Ranjit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject isn’t notable in Nepal. Given sources doesn’t meet criteria. Written as a promotional piece. Article is Full of information unsupported by given sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, Nepal, Australia, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S Yuva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cinematographer. Sources provided only mention the subject in passing, or not at all. Fails WP:FILMMAKER. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, too soon for an article. Declined three times by AfC reviewers and then rejected, after which the draft creator created it in mainspace. None of the sources is about S Yuva, they are all about movies he has worked on, and notability is not inherited. The draft creator has a conflict of interest and has received all information about the topic from S Yuva himself, disclosed here, where the creator also says that there are no reliable published sources. Fails both WP:CREATIVE and WP:BASIC. --bonadea contributions talk 10:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pino Concialdi

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns for six years. No edits for four years. I was unable to find any hits on Google News. Only five references so far and most are not directly about him. Already deleted once.Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 02:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet NARTIST. Both before and after his death there have been exhibits of his work, but I cannot find any outside of the area he lived in in Sicily. I also have not found anything indicating that his work is held in major (or even minor) museums. Lamona (talk) 04:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep As the article shows, his work is held in at least one museum, Museum Bagheria [24]. It may also be held in the other museum listed, Museo d'Arte Meditarraneo - it was certainly in an exhibition there, but the website doesn't seem to have a list of their permanent collection. A hard copy of the journal Arte Moderna might provide more information. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that he is not listed in the list of artists in the permanent collection of the Museum Bagheria. So his work appears to have been exhibited but is not held in the Museum. I haven't found him mentioned on the Museo d'Arte Mediterraneo site. Lamona (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 8600 Luna

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination. No substantive change after 18 years from frist nomination. Non-notable phone who's only references are de regur reviews that don't meet "substantial coverage". WP:NOTCATALOG applies. mikeblas (talk) 01:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, and Finland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Notability is not temporary. –DMartin 05:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The capsule de rigueur reviews and database entries used as references in this article did not establish notability. The previous AfD insisted there was adequate coverage available, but it never made it to the article which is largely unchanged in two decades since. Notability was not previously established. -- mikeblas (talk) 17:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Although the page can be improved, that doesnt seem to be the case since 2007. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I disagree that these reviews do not contain sigcov, and that in-depth "de rigueur" reviews should be discarded. This CNet review is two pages and is reasonably in-depth. There's also an in-depth review here. Keep in mind that reviews in publications that do a lot of reviews are the main independent sources for a lot of articles, e.g. video games. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniella Kolodny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are notable firsts along many intersections, but I don't think "first female rabbi enlisted in the United States Naval Academy" is particularly one of them. Outside of that distinction, there is nothing of biographical note here, so I'm not sure what criteria for inclusion this would meet. BD2412 T 00:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, Judaism, Israel, California, Maryland, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG Mztourist (talk) 06:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Erm? Two of the sources listed in the article are substantial coverage in reliable sources; that's a GNG pass. Not a strong one, but nonetheless. I agree with the nom that there are no other notability criteria applicable, but the GNG is criterion enough. Ravenswing 08:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haruki Yoshida

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Played once professionally [25], dropped down into lower leagues. Fails GNG. RossEvans19 (talk) 00:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. RossEvans19 (talk) 00:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG, I could only find 2 sources, one of which is independent fully. Not notable enough to be on the En Wikipedia. ✏️ C809 ⌨️ (let's chat) 06:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]