Talk:Super Bowl I

There is a request, submitted by GVnayR (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "important article about the first ever Super Bowl in the National Football League".

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 15, 2005, January 15, 2006, January 15, 2007, and January 15, 2017.

Green Bay Packers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas City Chiefs (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City Chiefs, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kansas City ChiefsWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas City ChiefsTemplate:WikiProject Kansas City ChiefsKansas City Chiefs

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

American Football League (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject American Football League, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.American Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject American Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject American Football LeagueAmerican Football League

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

While informative, I think this (and probably the other Super Bowl articles as well, assuming they have the same format) should be more encyclopaedic. There's no real introduction whatsoever to the article. Also, the text in headers should not really be in headers (would look ridiculous with numbering on). Jeronimo

You're right. frey I have a book here which gives precis of every game from I-XVII. I was planning to add info to them to make them more like Super Bowl IX. Not massively informative, but at least a little like an article. Work the headings into the text, and we'll be onto something. You're right about the headers too. I toned them down from

Like This

to3t

like this

but didn't want to upset whoever did the originally by totally making them over. It should be done, though. -- User:GWO

Well, if somebody doesn't want to be upset, he shouldn't contribute to Wikipedia :-)

But seriously, the IX article already looks better. Maybe a header like this would be nice:

Super Bowl IX, between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Minnesota Vikings, was held on January 12, 1975 in Tulane Stadium in New Orleans. Pittsburgh beat Minnesota 16 to 6 in front of 80,997 spectators.

Alternatively, we could put the data all in a table, such as:

**Super Bowl IX**
Data
Stadium	Tulane Stadium
City	New Orleans
Date	January 12, 1975
Attendance	80,997
Match
Pittsburgh Steelers	16	0	2	7	7
Minnesota Vikings	6	0	0	0	6

The introduction can then be a little shorter. What do you think? Jeronimo

Ooh, thats pretty... I like the look of that a lot. I think thats better than the boilerplate text above.

Thanks; I've started using tables a lot now, since they're a good way to present a lot of short facts. If there's other such facts, maybe we can include those as well. Not being an American, I don't know much about this kind of football, but I think the MVP may be worth mentioning?

Definitely, but its not in my reference :( I was going to add them later, when I found a list -- User:GWO

Also the colour of the table may be a little more cheerful, maybe there's a typical super bowl colour? Jeronimo

Don't know, I'm not American either ... -- User:GWO

Entertainment info question

While this article lists entertainment provided by the Arizona and U Michigan marching bands, neither band site shows this info.

The UM marching band site says that the first UM band performance at a Superbowl was the seventh bowl, and the Arizona band site says it played in 1987 and 1997.

Neither site mentions 1967. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.215.255.161 (talk • contribs) .

The references used for this article are:

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 18:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this helped alot with my project.

Position names

In the Starting Lineups table, could we see the full position names, rather than abbreviations? -Freekee 02:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Super-duper"

A historical note: The 1st of these NFL-AFL matchups that was a World Championship was the Jets stunning win over the Colts. In the first 2 that term was printed on the tickets but virtually no one aside from Lamar Hunt and his mother thought of those novelty exhibition-type contests (GB-KC, GB-Oak) as being "a step up" from the World Championship games that were GB-Dallas (in Dallas and then in the Ice Bowl). (Lombardi was nervous because it would have been an extreme humiliation to lose to the expansion league.)

A teacher once defined history as "a recreation of the mentality of the past". That's what's missing from all the hype, marketing and propaganda concerning these games. The NFL Titles of Lombardi, Unitas, etc. were not somehow equivalent to today's conference championships anymore than the WS wins of Ruth, DiMaggio and Mantle were equivalent to today's ALCS. It's Ronald McDonald McHistory.

The stadium for the Packers-Chiefs was 1/3 empty and the TV nets didn't even bother saving the tape. They re-used it and taped over the game.

Anyway, best regards. SMW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.94.183.3 (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inconsistency regarding halftime entertainment

In the standard sidebar you have on all Super Bowl games that lists score, advertising rates, and halftime entertainment, you state that the University of Michigan band performed. Elsewhere in the same article, though, it states that it was Grambling, and not Michigan. I am inclined to believe that the Grambling attribution is the correct one. So, in my first ever attempt to provide input to a Wikipedia article, I added another phrase to an existing sentence, resulting in one that read "At least one source incorrectly lists the University of Michigan Band, and Wikipedia itself repeats that error in its Halftime window in the top right portion of the article". Within four minutes the change was backed out by JojHutton. I am probably not the first updater of a Wikipedia article whose initial experience was soured by his brusque style. Given the level of difficulty I had in my first-time attempt at updating the body of an article, I shudder when I imagine what kind of outcome would come from updating the sidebar.

It was never my expectation that my little change would be a permanent one, but I had hoped it might at least trigger a correction by someone more senior in the Wikipedia community. Is that an unreasonable hope? WoodyMoore (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/history/entertainment currently lists Michigan. Zzyzx11 (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Super Bowl 001" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Super Bowl 001 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 7 § 3 digit Super Bowl redirects until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]